Search for: "Wells v Guzman" Results 1 - 20 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Florida, 23-5171Issue: Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a felony (rescheduled before the Nov. 17, Dec. 1, Dec. 8, Jan. 5, Jan. 12, Jan. 19, Feb. 16, Feb. 23, Mar. 1, Mar. 15, Mar. 22 and Mar 28 conferences; relisted after the Apr. 12 and Apr. 19 conferences) Guzman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The court has only granted two cases for next term so far, putting them well behind the number of grants they would normally have this time of year. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 8:07 am by Liberty Ritchie
We opposed the removal and the improper attempt at burden shifting by relying on a recent Kansas case, Guzman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Guest Author
EPA (interpretation must be permissible in light of statutory context as well as text); King v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:20 pm by David Oscar Markus
But it is notdictum.11By operation of Florida’s well-settled “ Pardo rule,” see Pardo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
New California Supreme Court opinion on geographic scope of UCL remedies in a public prosecutor action; local prosecutors may recover statewide civil penalties as well as statewide injunctive relief: Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
., as well as in other developed countries.[18] HAV is relatively stable and can survive for several hours on fingertips and hands, and up to two months on dry surfaces.[19] The virus can be inactivated by heating to 185°F (85°C) or higher for one minute, or disinfecting surfaces with a 1:100 dilution of household bleach in tap water.[20] HAV can still be spread from cooked food if it is contaminated after cooking.[21] Although ingestion of contaminated food is a… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
“Given that this year marks the 200th anniversary of a foundational case for federal Indian law and policy [Johnson v. [read post]