Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 74,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Justin Granier did not fare so well; the court declined to take his case asking whether courts can infer juror bias from the circumstances surrounding the case. [read post]
This decision was brought to the Court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Carl v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Well, it doesn't protect that speech from the landowner's decision about what to exclude; the Klan, for instance, had no First Amendment right to force the Cana, Virginia property owner in Black v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Our lawyers have significant experience assessing the availability and strengths of various potential defences in voyeurism cases, as well as presenting any and all available defences to the court at trial. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton (75 ALA. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
For further information regarding this act, contact Liskow attorneys Greg Johnson, Clare Bienvenu, Emily von Qualen and Colin North and visit our Environmental practice page. 1In an April 1 letter to a Louisiana Senator, the EPA Region 6 Administrator stated the following: “EPA has concerns that the [CAMRA] may preclude the use of any credible evidence to determine compliance under the [CAA] and may conflict with Louisiana’s federally approved Title V and… [read post]