Search for: "Westwood v. Westwood"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
” in chalk on sidewalks and school buildings as the marchers made their way across the Westwood campus. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:58 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm
COMINT Systems Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
[The exam in my American legal history course consists of two essays, one on the legal history of some regulatory regime my students did not study but which developed much like those they did. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bank, N.A. v Westwood, LLC, 115 AD3d 935, 937-938; Viafax Corp. v Citicorp Leasing, Inc., 54 AD3d at 850). [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
City of Palo Alto (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 286, 302; Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:14 am
” The first episode is titled “Bush v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Rosell v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
(Hodgins v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) has spent five years drafting a comprehensive update to 30 sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.[1] The updated text[2] (“Final Text”) ensures the Guidelines are consistent with recent court decisions, implements legislative changes, clarifies rules governing the CEQA process, and eliminates duplicative analysis. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm
Westwood Grp. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership, et al.,2018 WL 4006425 (C.D. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
” The court rejected these claims, reasoning that in contrast to prior seminal cases involving discretionary approvals, such as Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
” The court rejected these claims, reasoning that in contrast to prior seminal cases involving discretionary approvals, such as Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
” The court rejected these claims, reasoning that in contrast to prior seminal cases involving discretionary approvals, such as Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
One of my students sent his sister to In-N-Out in Westwood to investigate; she came back with photographic evidence that the 3×3 is not consistently packaged in bags bearing the TRIPLE TRIPLE mark (shown here: her 3×3 in a Double-Double bag). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
” The Court rejected these claims, reasoning that in contrast to prior seminal cases involving discretionary approvals, such as Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
” The Court noted “[a]n important elaboration” of ministerial/discretionary analysis is the “functional test” announced in Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
