Search for: "White Castle System, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 8:22 am
White Castle System, Inc., 2023 IL 128004, the Illinois Supreme Court held that claims under Sections 15(b) and (d) of the BIPA accrue “with every scan or transmission” of alleged biometric identifiers or biometric information. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:05 pm
White Castle Sys., Inc., 2023 IL 128004 (July 18, 2023). [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Seven of the eight proxy contests that have gone to a vote in the US this year have resulted in management clean sweeps, including proxy contests at large cap companies such as Crown Castle Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Seven of the eight proxy contests that have gone to a vote in the US this year have resulted in management clean sweeps, including proxy contests at large cap companies such as Crown Castle Inc. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:43 pm
White Castle Sys., Inc., 2023 IL 128004 (July 18, 2023). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am
White Castle Sys., Inc., held that claims arising under Section 15(b) of BIPA accrue each time a company either collects or discloses an individual’s biometric information without prior informed consent. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am
White Castle Sys., Inc., held that claims arising under Section 15(b) of BIPA accrue each time a company either collects or discloses an individual’s biometric information without prior informed consent. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am
White Castle Sys., Inc., held that claims arising under Section 15(b) of BIPA accrue each time a company either collects or discloses an individual’s biometric information without prior informed consent. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm
White Castle System Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:17 am
White Castle System, Inc., 2023 IL 128004 (Ill. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:36 am
White Castle System Inc., the Illinois Supreme Court held that BIPA violations accrue each time a company collects an individual’s biometric information without complying with the law’s notice and consent requirements. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:23 pm
White Castle System Inc., the Illinois Supreme Court held that BIPA violations accrue each time a company collects an individual’s biometric information without complying with the law’s notice and consent requirements. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm
White Castle System, Inc. 2023 IL 128004, in which the court held that the statute of limitations accrues with each scan or transmission of biometric identifiers or biometric information for claims arising under Sections 15(b) and 15(d) of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:55 pm
In Cothron, the plaintiff, a manager of a White Castle System Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm
White Castle System, Inc. 2023 IL 128004, in which the court held that the statute of limitations accrues with each scan or transmission of biometric identifiers or biometric information for claims arising under Sections 15(b) and 15(d) of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm
White Castle System, Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm
White Castle System, Inc., No. 128004, which was argued in May 2022. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:05 pm
White Castle System, Inc., No. 128004 (Ill.). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:36 am
White Castle System Inc., and is set to decide when claims under Sections 15(b) and 15(d) of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act accrue. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
In Castle Rock v. [read post]