Search for: "White Mountain Apache Tribe"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
Arizona Department of Revenue (White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:31 am
Here is the amended complaint in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 2:43 pm
White Mountain Apache Tribe Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:32 pm
The Court then applied the balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:35 am
The majority then analyzed the state’s jurisdiction under the federal Indian law preemption analysis under White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:24 am
Here are the materials in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 6:24 am
§§ 261-263) or the Bracker balancing test (see White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:31 pm
S.3168/H.R.5880 - A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to modify the enforceability date for certain provisions, and for other purposes. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:26 am
The Mescalero Apache Tribe Chief Judge. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 6:43 am
The mapmaker noted that nomadic tribes called the area home, and the massive Pawnee Empire that spread throughout much of present day Nebraska and Kansas is also marked. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:53 am
White Mountain Apache Tribe RFP. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 2:47 pm
Mescalero Apache Tribe Associate Judge, Mescalero, NM. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
As of the July 10, 2019 hearing, six additional tribes had confirmed the minor was not an Indian child, and the two remaining tribes (the Navajo Nation and the White Mountain Apache Tribe) had acknowledged contact but had not yet provided a definitive response. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:08 am
Here is the complaint in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:50 am
.: 20200514142407520_Petition for Writ of Certiorari 20200514142428474_Appendix for Petition for Writ of Certiorari Question presented: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing… [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
Plaintiff argues that our cursory preemption analysis there is clearly irreconcilable with White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:50 am
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.html White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
