Search for: "White v. Head et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
” (Penebaker docs: texts, p. 2) On Nov. 15, Troupis texts Chesebro that he is “headed to Washington in the AM to brief the White House. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Johann Baptist Homann et al. 1715. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
(Voting Rights Act; Redistricting) Fahy, et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Anyway, the now 32-year-old owner of the then-four-month-old penis depicted in the photo has sued Nirvana et al., alleging that the naked baby photo is child pornography. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:24 am
(finding that the “accident” was the aortic dissection suffered by the plaintiff, which was allegedly caused by the defendants failure to diagnose); Billodeau, et al v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
City of Los Angeles (Rony Shram, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Kreder, Jennifer Anglim et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
, Best v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court granted review in a free speech case, 303 Creative, et al. v. [read post]
