Search for: "Wiesman"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am
In a 42-page decision rejecting the government’s application, Judge Fuentes, in large part, echoed Judge Wiesman’s earlier opinion. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
To combat the rising numbers, the governor and Secretary of Health John Wiesman are changing guidance and regulations around restaurants, bars, and fitness centers as well as weddings and funerals. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
Wiesman (4,449 words) and the death penalty petition Murphy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:41 am
Wiesman’s opinions and conclusions regarding use of force, restraints, and isolation will be excluded because they are analyzed under standards that are not applicable to the defendant. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:51 am
Wiesman, in which owners of a Washington pharmacy challenged a state rule requiring pharmacies to sell certain abortifacient drugs. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:26 pm
Wiesman; Alito dissent joined by Roberts and Thomas] Tags: pharmaceuticals, religious liberty, Supreme Court “Court delivers a bitter pill on religious freedom” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm
Wiesman [SCOTUSblog backgrounder], a case challenging a Washington regulation requiring pharmacies to sell birth control despite potential religious objections of employees. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Wiesman (2016) undermines his opposition to abortion and is a devastating rebuttal to the conservative dissents in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:59 am
Wiesman, Justice Alito ends his introductory paragraph (technically, his second paragraph) with this: "If this is a sign of how religious liberty claims will be treated in the years ahead, those who value religious freedom have cause for great concern. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:48 am
Wiesman, (Docket No. 15-682, cert. denied 6/28/2016), but over a 15-page dissent to the denial of certiorari written by Justice Alito and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Wiesman, a case in which a drug store operator sought to gain the right, for religious reasons, to refuse to fill doctors’ prescriptions for birth-control. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:34 am
Wiesman, No. 15-862, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Wiesman, 15-862, involves a group of pharmacists who are challenging, under the Free Exercise Clause, a Washington state regulation that requires pharmacies to dispense lawfully prescribed drugs, but whose statutory exemptions don’t include one for religious objectors. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Wiesman, 15-862, which won its fifth relist nomination; hard to believe a contender that has achieved this degree of relist success ever had to pay its dues on the serial-rescheduling circuit. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Wiesman, 15-862, on its fourth relist, challenges a Washington state regulation requiring pharmacies (though not individual pharmacists) to dispense lawfully prescribed drugs or devices to patients. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:37 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
Wiesman, 15-862, which challenges a Washington state regulation requiring pharmacies (though not individual pharmacists) to dispense lawfully prescribed drugs or devices to patients. [read post]
