Search for: "Wiggins v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 14, April 22, April 29, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 2, June 9, June 16 and June 23 conferences) Thomas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 14, April 22, April 29, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 2, June 9 and June 16 conferences) Thomas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by John Elwood
Richter “established a substantial likelihood standard for evaluating prejudice” that exceeds the standard in Wiggins v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Caroline Kean, a partner at Wiggin and leading media defence lawyer, has urged MPs to show “guts” and act to protect public interest journalism in England and Wales from the existential threat posed by public figures and bodies attempting to shut down criticism. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Chien Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law Thomas F. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, so the amicus to defend the judgment would ordinarily be appointed by (and typically be a former law clerk of) Circuit Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
Lastly, a day after the regular order list, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas issued a four-sentence statement respecting the petition for certiorari in Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
The Nintendo v PC Box case provided guidance in relation to what constitutes TPMs and whether they apply to video games (in particular, where a combination of software- and hardware-based measures have been implemented) . [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The following excerpt from Pope v Wiggins cited by the court is exactly on point: Under §124 of the Constitution (of Mississippi) of 1890, the power to grant pardons and to otherwise extend clemency, after the judicial process whereby one has been convicted of a crime has come to an end, is vested in the governor alone... [read post]