Search for: "William Miller v. Alabama State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
State Bar of Cal., 366 U.S. 36 (1961). 2126, 2130. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The result of the case could make it more difficult for minority communities to claim new election laws are discriminatory and raise the bar for what has to happen to get relief from the courts. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:28 pm
Life Sentences for Juvenile Offenders In Miller v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Judge William H. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Alabama has retroactive effect, and whether Miller announced a new substantive rule that is retroactive in cases on state collateral review. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
(This lack of empirical input concerning public perceptions was also a feature of another First Amendment case, Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:38 am
Supreme Court case Miller v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
California, 13-9118; and Williams v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Alabama ex. rel. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:25 am
ProPublica explores states’ varied responses to the Court’s consolidated opinion in Miller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Miller v. [read post]
