Search for: "Williams v. Marks" Results 1 - 20 of 2,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Pension Fund, 185 AD3d at 814 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Singleton v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 208 AD3d at 883). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Pension Fund, 185 AD3d at 814 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Singleton v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 208 AD3d at 883). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Harbut, Peter Infante, William E. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
As we gather to mark ten years of dialogue, I think it’s important to both summarize what we’ve learned during this period and see how we can leverage those lessons to effect better compliance in the future. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by admin
Metabolife Internat’l, Inc., 401 F.3d 1233, 1249 (11th Cir. 2005) (distinguishing agency assessment of risk from judicial assessment of causation); Williams v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An accountant who has been retained to perform a “review engagement” is responsible for duties more limited in scope than an accountant hired to conduct an audit (William Iselin & Co. v Mann Judd Landau, 71 NY2d 420, 424-425 [1988]). [read post]