Search for: "Williams v Light"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of cert, arguing that the court’s 1970 decision in Williams v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:27 am
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 8:06 am
Williams. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am
Justices Leave Door Open to Discovery Rule Copyright Damages — Bloomberg Law’s Kyle Jahner writes about yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Correctional Admin., 892 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2018) (“materially changes” employment conditions in a manner “more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities”); Williams v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
(LNC) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
Taking the harm together, it is considerable – although (in the light of the survival of most of the physical features that currently contribute to significance, and in light of the various positive features of the scheme) not such as to reach the threshold of “serious” harm referred to in Penshurst (which corresponds with the concept of ‘substantial’ harm in the secular system). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Texas v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Post cites a letter from William Allen White as an illustration of the "innocent confidence of progressives. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:16 am
From Judge William Alsup's Tentative Order filed Tuesday in Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
"] From Coffeeshop, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
In light of the parish’s response to the Victorian Society’s objection, the DAC recommended the proposal for approval by the Court, having regard to all the matters before him, the Deputy Chancellor was satisfied that a faculty should be granted [14]. [read post]
