Search for: "Williams v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
Even then, you can only sue the police or department of social services for certain things. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
Department of Social Services that “Congress did intend municipalities and other local government units to be included among those persons to whom § 1983 applies. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
  However, effective January 31, 2016, the date of adjustment of the Child Support Combined Income Cap was changed to March 1" rather than January 31' to conform with the date of adjustment of the self-support reserve pursuantto Social Services Law § 111-I (2)(b). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am by Mark Graber
Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, “even where such aid may be necessary to secure life, liberty, or property interests of which the government itself may not deprive the individual. [read post]