Search for: "Williams v. United States Marshal" Results 1 - 20 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
” Chief Justice John Marshall and others in the founding generation followed a third way, most prominently in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm by Andrew Sather
Secretary of State, 1800-1801Appointed Chief justice of the United States, February 4, 1801Famous Cases:Marbury v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in defense of free speech has proven more powerful and lasting than the original holding. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
President John Adams offered this appraisal of Marshall’s impact: “My gift of John Marshall to the people of the United States was the proudest act of my life. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] An influential Virginia judge and a professor of law at the College of William and Mary, St. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, President Adams appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:42 am
Tushnet, one of the pre-eminent constitutional scholars in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:11 am by NCC Staff
Brennan later was serving on the New Jersey state Supreme Court when President Dwight Eisenhower nominated him to the United States Supreme Court as a recess appointment. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 2:50 pm by Josh Blackman
"He's the most important Supreme Court justice, certainly of the first 100 years of the United States," Finkelman said. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (Artist: Gardener Cox) The Oyez site reports that Congressional leaders, especially those from the South, were worried about the potential of a liberal justice being appointed to the Court following the landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]