Search for: "Wilson v. Duncan" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
He was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
  She was one of the most highly respected and brilliant members of the media law bar and an editor of the leading textbook, Duncan and Neill. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by William C. MacLeod and Darby Hobbs
  Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the Hewitt en banc majority had a heterodox makeup: Ho, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Twelve members (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reverse on lenity grounds. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm by Josh Blackman
The majority opinion was written by Judge Jones, and was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Southwick, Haynes, Costa, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Ho recused, and Judge Wilson joined the court after the case was submitted, and did not participate. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  These pirate sites have no intention of subjecting themselves to the jurisdiction of U.S. courts but want the benefits of U.S. law, all the while marketing themselves in the U.S. in direct competition with the creators, including creators, whose works they steal.[10] The digital pirates’ fascination with creating these offshore “pirate utopias” (or “Temporary Autonomous Zones” or “TAZ”) dates back to the 1991 hacker’s handbook by the anarchist… [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a piece on 5RB and a post on the Brett Wilson blog. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Bauer Media v Wilson (No2) [2018] VSCA 154, (Australia) Rebel Wilson’s defamation award of A$4,749,920.60 against Bauer Media was the subject of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Victoria. [read post]