Search for: "Wilson v. Mr. Givens et al" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Richard Hunt
Mike Shalabi, et al., CV219466MWFGJSX, 2022 WL 193967, at *6 (C.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
KENNETH KAYSER, et al., Appellees. : : : Case No. 3:19-cv-00363 : : Judge Thomas M. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ledesma-Cadhit et al, the plaintiffs invoked the PHACA as a basis for suing a physician and pharmaceutical company in negligence, after their 5 year old daughter died, allegedly as a result of the administration of the H1N1 influenza vaccination during a pandemic health risk in 2009. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am by Patricia Hughes
Retail Clerks’ International Union et al). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Live blog of hand-down. 1026: The judgment will be available once the hand down is complete. 1027: Counsel et al taking their seats. 1033: Lady Hale setting out the timeline. 1036: The issue is justiciable, and a unanimous decision of all 11 Justices. 1038: This court has concluded that this case is about the limits of the power to advise the Monarch. 1039: Relevant limit on the power to prorogue is – unlawful if it frustrates or prevents the ability of Parliament to… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on whether it has… [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm by Giles Peaker
The review was by Minos Perdios – who has been pushing a particular line on the interpretation of vulnerability after Hotak et al – and Haringey’s medical report, such as it was, was by Now Medical, from a Dr James Wilson, a ‘psychiatric advisor’. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 (We’ll come back to whether Litigation III’s portfolio is a proper allocation of the taxpayers’ resources given that the structure just makes agency capture that much easier.) [read post]