Search for: "Worth v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
In Bradford v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 7:30 am
Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Although most assume this is just a practical obstacle to a contemporary prosecution, it's worth reminding folks about "desuetude"—the legal doctrine pursuant to which statutes (especially criminal ones) may lapse if they are never enforced (interested readers should check out a fantastic 2006 student note on the subject in the Harvard Law Review). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
In Wyers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
While certification to the Supreme Court is unlikely to return to common practice, it’s a procedure worth knowing and in appropriate cases asking for. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
For what it's worth, I think the Court probably reached the right result with respect to the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, albeit not quite for the right reasons. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
A video is worth a thousand pictures. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
But it’s worth noting that even in mid-February, we have a pair of cases still hanging around from the end-of-summer long conference and on their 11th relists. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
Particularly in South Texas and along the IH35 corridor through North Texas and the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, the danger of illegal re-entry charges is real for a growing number of people. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
He failed to do so, the court concluded, because certain directors did not face a substantial likelihood of liability for the oversight, waste, and disclosure claims, and one of the directors was sufficiently independent from Skechers’ founder and largest shareholder (Conte v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
A first question worth asking is where Chinese antiquities are going—whether they flow to “market nations” or circulate domestically. [read post]
