Search for: "YOUNG v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
The United Nations was to be the main clearinghouse for those efforts to foster and promote international peace and security. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Maine concedes that the Department barely engages in any such scrutiny when enforcing the "nonsectarian" requirement. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
Hence, the government did not owe or breach any substantive constitutional duty to the young boy or his adult guardian. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
"[28] Yet all these cases don't generally explain why they are departing from the norm applicable in other reputational risk cases (except insofar as some of the university cases suggest that young adults should get special protection beyond what older adults get[29]). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
Two other cases were not decided until after the War Department had concluded that internment was no longer a military necessity. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
One of the main challenges for policymakers is determining how these emerging products should be treated with respect to tax policy. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Not only are race, capitalism and Constitution the three main ideas of his jurisprudence, but they also track and tell the story of Thomas’ life. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
With that, we move on to the three main relists. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Authors’ main issue is that we can’t address ebook piracy sites—hide behind 512. [read post]