Search for: "York v. Shalala*"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York found that allegations a drug company offered inducements “to physicians quite openly” cut against an inference of scienter.[17] The Central District of California, in Gharibian v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
“Before Virus Outbreak, a Cascade of Warnings Went Unheeded,” declared the New York Times headline. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
According to Steil and Traficonte, the Court’s Bank of America v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
New York State Liquor Authority, 134 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1998); Flying Dog Brewery, LLLP v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Health Ctr. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:56 am
Highlights this week included: US: CAFC: Patent exhaustion does not apply to genetically engineered seed: Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:43 am
A little over two months ago, I wrote about the Obama Administration's eye-opening amicus brief in support of the Petitioner in Douglas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New York and to Judge Frank M. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
” Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
Gibbs v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Dietary supplement claims must be substantiated by scientific evidence, the FDA has guidance for industry about this. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:09 am
It appears that the Botox suit is claiming free speech protections that are similar to those that are currently provided for dietary supplements under the questionable decision of Pearson and Shaw v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
NidekThe first of these was Perez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
Claiborne Hardware, 458 U.S. 886, 920 (1982); New York Times Co. v. [read post]