Search for: "ZR"
Results 1 - 20
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Juni 2015 - XI ZR 243/13) seine Rechtsprechung in den sogenannten Anweisungsfällen geändert. [read post]
22 May 2024, 11:55 pm
Bundesgerichtshof, 18 April 2023, II ZR 184/21 Susanne Zwirlein-Forschner discusses a decision of the German Federal Court of Justice on the law applicable to liability due to economically destructive actions and to the assignment of claims. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:50 pm
However, for the sake of consistent terminology, ‘creative freedom’ should not be confused with ‘artistic freedom’, the latter notion being used by the German Federal Supreme Court, for instance in USM Haller (I ZR 96/22), but also, unfortunately, in the German version of Cofemel (C-683/17; para 31) while the English version uses the notion ‘creative freedom’ and the French ‘liberté créative’. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Januar 2024, II ZR 220/22) zeigt auf, welche Voraussetzungen beim Missbrauch der Vertretungsmacht vorliegen müssen (zu diesem Thema siehe bereits meinen Beitrag hier). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm
The case (Extreme Durable, I ZR 205/22) focuses on whether the possession of goods abroad constitutes trade mark infringement if the goods are held for the purpose of offering them in the country where the trade mark is protected - in this case, goods stored in Spain and offered for sale on www.amazon.de, which targets German consumers. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:34 am
Claim 1 defines the M2 term as follows: “M2 represents Mg and at least one metal element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Zr, Ge, Nb, Al and Sn. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
A case tackling some of these issues is now pending before the German Supreme Court and the judges found it necessary to ask the Court of Justice of the EU (‘CJEU’) whether the possession of goods abroad constitutes trade mark infringement if the goods are held for the purpose of offering them in the country where the trade mark is protected (Extreme Durable, I ZR 205/22). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:12 am
Bаskеtbоl üzrə mərс xətləri siyаhısı dа yаxşıdır – bir hаdisə üçün 400 müxtəlif nətiсə. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:08 am
The European Court of Justice will have to deal with this question following a reference from the German Federal Supreme Court (Decision of 23 January 2024 in Case I ZR 205/22). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:14 am
BGE X ZR 64/21 of the German Federal Court of Justice)). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
According to the German Supreme Court, it is the defendant (Converse I, I ZR 52/10, at para. 30). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
German Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 4 June 1992, Case IX ZR 149/91 (BGHZ 118, 312): German Law's Dilemma with Punitive DamagesJohannes Ungerer (University of Oxford, UK)8. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:53 am
The process of any of claims 1 to 12, wherein Y is selected from the group consisting of Si, Sn, Ti, Zr, Ge and combinations of two or more thereof, Y preferably being Si, and wherein X is selected from the group consisting of Al, B, In, Ga, Fe and combinations of two or more thereof, X preferably being Al. 17. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
by Patrick Ostendorf (HTW Berlin) The principle of party autonomy gives the parties to a contract the opportunity to determine the applicable substantive (contract) law themselves by means of a choice-of-law clause – and thus to avoid (simple) mandatory rules that would otherwise bite. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:34 am
In Germany, for example, prosecution history should not used for claim interpretation, i.e. there is no file wrapper estoppel (Kunststoffrohrteil, X ZR 43/01) (although prosecution claim amendments may possibly be taken into account for consideration of infringement by equivalence). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
In its verdict of September 15, 2023 (case reference V ZR 77/22), the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) increased the requirements to be placed on a seller in the context of due diligence. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
In its verdict of September 15, 2023 (case reference V ZR 77/22), the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) increased the requirements to be placed on a seller in the context of due diligence. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm
In its verdict of September 15, 2023 (case reference V ZR 77/22), the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) increased the requirements to be placed on a seller in the context of due diligence. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:23 pm
In its verdict of September 15, 2023 (case reference V ZR 77/22), the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) increased the requirements to be placed on a seller in the context of due diligence. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:22 pm
In its verdict of September 15, 2023 (case reference V ZR 77/22), the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) increased the requirements to be placed on a seller in the context of due diligence. [read post]
