Search for: "Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Thus, for instance, in Zacchini v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:52 am
Kellman v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., described the right of publicity as “closely analogous to the goals of patent and copyright law. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:24 am
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. (1977) that such a right is constitutional as to at least a very narrow range of uses, where a broadcaster copies a performer’s entire act (there it was Hugo Zacchini’s Human Cannonball performance). [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
Scripps-Howard Broad. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
[Compare [No Doubt v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Scripps-Howard Broad. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
An injunction was applied for but again was rejected.At the Supreme Court level there has only been one case of Zacchini v Scripps- Howard Broadcasting Company, otherwise known as the Human Cannonball case where the defendants broadcast the entirety of a 15 second clip of a guy shooting himself out of a canon. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
Scripps-Howard Broad. [read post]