Search for: "Zhong v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
Our friend Alexandra Shapiro of Shapiro Arato Bach, LLP, earned an important victory this week in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:48 am
Huang practises law as a Shenzhen-based associate at Hui Zhong Law Firm. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
Zhong as inventors and as applicants with designation for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
MartinCase Number: 12-cv-00033 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case Filed: January 3, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 16, 2015 4/1/15 6/30/15 2015-35 SEC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:13 pm
This pathogen is a common cause of foodborne illnesses in many Asian countries, including China, Japan and Taiwan, and is recognized as the leading cause of human gastroenteritis associated with seafood consumption in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
GroveCase number: 14-cv-61685 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida)Case filed: July 24, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 31, 2014 08/21/2014 11/19/2014 2014-82 SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm
As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm
As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/05/02/10-10079.pdf United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am
Spar Shipping as v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company Ltd, [2015] EWHC 718 (Comm). 2. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
Ignazio Castellucci, University of Trento, Italy Topic: Supervision v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:10 am
FEC, Conflicts of interest, Institutional Investors, Pension funds, Political spending,Social capital, State law, Supreme Court Berkshire’s Blemishes: Lessons for Buffett’s Successors, Peers, and Policy Posted by Lawrence A. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
Article 7 urges a signatory state to prohibit the importation of illicitly transferred cultural property from another state while Article 9 allows a state whose cultural property is in jeopardy to request assistance from other states.[4] CPIA allows foreign states to enter into bilateral agreements (or Memorandum of Understanding) with the U.S., which entails an import restriction on cultural property of certain types and from certain periods. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States, to name but a few. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Zhong, the inventors. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Cooper, & Liang Zhong summarized the issue as follows: The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and its implementing regulations, broadly prohibit operators of online services directed at children under 13 from collecting personal information without providing notice of its data collection and use practices and obtaining verifiable parental consent. [read post]
