Search for: "Zhong v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
Article 7 urges a signatory state to prohibit the importation of illicitly transferred cultural property from another state while Article 9 allows a state whose cultural property is in jeopardy to request assistance from other states.[4] CPIA allows foreign states to enter into bilateral agreements (or Memorandum of Understanding) with the U.S., which entails an import restriction on cultural property of certain types and from certain periods. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Cooper, & Liang Zhong summarized the issue as follows: The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and its implementing regulations, broadly prohibit operators of online services directed at children under 13 from collecting personal information without providing notice of its data collection and use practices and obtaining verifiable parental consent. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:13 pm by Bill Marler
This pathogen is a common cause of foodborne illnesses in many Asian countries, including China, Japan and Taiwan, and is recognized as the leading cause of human gastroenteritis associated with seafood consumption in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
Spar Shipping as v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company Ltd, [2015] EWHC 718 (Comm). 2. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:48 am by Guangjian Tu
Huang practises law as a Shenzhen-based associate at Hui Zhong Law Firm. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Edward S. Zas
Our friend Alexandra Shapiro of Shapiro Arato Bach, LLP, earned an important victory this week in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am by Sophia Tang
The first is the Supreme Court’s ruling in Huawei v Conversant, (2019) Zui Gao Fa Zhi Min Zhong 732, 733 and 734 No 1. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am by Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
Assisted in coordinating the Produce Safety Rule oriented On-Farm Readiness Review (OFRR) training programs under the leadership of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), the FDA, and produce oriented professionals from several State Cooperative Extension Services2. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:48 am by Sophia Tang
In Cathay United Bank v Gao, Shanghai High Court, (2016) Hu Min Xia Zhong No 99, the appellant, a Taiwan commercial bank, and the respondent, a Chinese citizen resident in Shanghai, entered into a Guarantee contract. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:10 am
FEC, Conflicts of interest, Institutional Investors, Pension funds, Political spending,Social capital, State law, Supreme Court Berkshire’s Blemishes: Lessons for Buffett’s Successors, Peers, and Policy Posted by Lawrence A. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 9:38 pm
Joelson, Arbitration in the United States under the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Ioannis Avgoustis, A short note on the Piraeus Maritime Arbitration Rules Manuel Gómez Carrión, Joinder of third parties: new institutional developments Rizwan Hussain, Taisei Corporation v A.M. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
MartinCase Number: 12-cv-00033 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case Filed: January 3, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 16, 2015 4/1/15 6/30/15 2015-35 SEC v. [read post]