Search for: "*black v. State of Tex"
Results 181 - 200
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 10:28 am
Haynes, Tex., 269 S.W. 216, 220. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm
Texas, conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a singular blistering opinion blasting Texas’s civil asset forfeiture statute—Tex. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Shannon, Competency, Ethics, and Morality, 49 TEX. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
State, No. 71,997 (Tex. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court will review Barr v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
(Tex. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:46 pm
Tex. 1936). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
In Texas, the 4 year period found in Tex. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Merck & Co., 347 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2010). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: An argument that is V for Vacuous. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
Paradise, which upheld against an equal protection clause challenge a state scheme that required the promotion of one black employee for every white employee. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Activism is the new black! [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:09 am
For example, in Fteja v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
