Search for: "*long v. Murphy" Results 181 - 200 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm by Ilya Somin
" But Judge Mendez concludes that "the constitutionality of Section 1373 [is] highly suspect" after the Supreme Court's recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Steve Vladeck
The William Murphy precedent is not “obscure”—it has merely been obscured by a plurality of the Supreme Court in Hamdan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 9:47 am by Ilya Somin
Judge Orrick also follows these and other federal court decisions in ruling that Section 1373 is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
On Monday 11 October 2021, the Labour Party named Seumas Milne, Karie Murphy, Georgie Robertson, Laura Murray and Harry Hayball as the individuals responsible for leaking the report entitled “The work of the Labour Party’s Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014-2019. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
The long-awaited decision affects hundreds of thousands of white-collar workers in industries such as retail, food service, insurance and banking who are called managers or assistant managers but who spend much of their day ringing up sales, stocking shelves or sweeping the floor alongside the workers they oversee.Class-action lawsuits by employees seeking back pay for overtime and missed breaks have risen dramatically over the last decade, and lawyers predicted that Monday's ruling… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” The Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog kicks off a two-week-long symposium on in Lucia v. [read post]