Search for: "*stanley v. Stanley"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,771
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
4/7/1969: Stanley v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am
According to petitioner, the disease was caused by the...click to Continue Reading…Correction Officer Receives 60 Days Suspension for Excessive Use of Force - In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard… In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed… [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am
According to petitioner, the disease was caused by the...click to Continue Reading…Correction Officer Receives 60 Days Suspension for Excessive Use of Force - In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard… In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard… In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed the inmate in a chokehold. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:04 am
Ngnoguem v Milton Keynes Council (2020] EWCA Civ 396 We’ve seen this prefigured in Stanley v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 1458 (our note), but the relevant parts of that judgment on late reviews were strictly obiter, as the court had found that there was an agreement to extend time. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Hyman, director of the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; and Philip Sabes, Professor Emeritus in Physiology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:49 pm
Rock Against Racism and Stanley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:51 am
Zive v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:00 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:43 am
Here are the materials in New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court today denied review in Stanley v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:19 pm
See Amarin Pharma v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
Yesterday’s published decision in Hale v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:08 am
Lee Living Trust, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
