Search for: "*u.s. v. Sharpe" Results 181 - 200 of 1,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 7:24 pm by Todd Rodriguez
Earlier this month the closely watched case of U.S. ex rel Drakeford v Tuomey Healthcare System Inc. (675 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 2012) concluded with a jury finding that the compensation paid to physicians under certain part-time employment agreements by Tuomey Healthcare System resulted in violations of both the federal False Claims Act and the federal Stark law. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:30 pm by Howard Bashman
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit consisting of Circuit Judges Paul V. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Another consequence has been a rash of enhanced state and federal laws intended to crack down on what were viewed as sharp practices by the mortgage lending industry that harmed homeowner borrowers and, more broadly, their communities.An earlier post on this blog highlighted The New York Times' recognition of Minnesota at the forefront of such changes.In that context, it is noteworthy that Judge Tunheim, U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
Evans, 514 U.S. 1, 13, and applies only where its “purpose is effectively advanced,” Illinois v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
Maynard suggested an alternative basis for the Michigan law, one that Judge Patricia Millett of the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:25 am by Tom Lamb
Supreme Court made a ruling on the federal preemption legal issue in these Fosamax cases in May 2019 (see Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
Sharp Electronics Corp., 485 U.S. 717, 724 (1988), (quoting Continental T.V., Inc. v. [read post]