Search for: "A B"
Results 181 - 200
of 158,068
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:39 pm
Immigrants’ Rights Policy Clinic, Center for Immigration Law and Policy, UCLA School of Law, June 2024 "This white paper addresses two misconceptions. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:35 pm
USCIS, June 20, 2024 "We are extending the validity of certain Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) issued to Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries under the designations of El Salvador, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua and Sudan through March 9, 2025. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
As the Board held in Cemex: “an employer violates Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by refusing to recognize, upon request, a union that has been designated as Section 9(a) representative by the majority of employees in an appropriate unit unless the employer promptly files a petition pursuant to Section 9(c)(1)(B) of the Act (an RM petition) to test the union’s majority status or the appropriateness of the unit, assuming that the union has not already filed a petition pursuant to… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 11:08 am
Cashing out the deferred tax when you eliminate it, even if at a reduced rate, is very difficult to argue against on policy grounds.Right-wing activists nonetheless challenged the MRT here on the grounds that (a) the income was unrealized by the taxpayer, and (b) per the long-discredited 1920 Supreme Court case of Eisner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:03 am
Matter of H-C-R-C- (1) Applicants bear the burden of establishing their own credibility, and no statute or legal precedent compels an Immigration Judge to conclude that an applicant’s testimony is credible. (2) Rape is sufficiently severe to constitute torture and can never be a lawful sanction under the Convention Against Torture. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 8:42 am
Stuart Anderson, Forbes, June 19, 2024 " “The parole in place provisions for undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens will get more press attention, but the other administrative action may be just as important,” said Cornell Law School professor Stephen Yale-Loehr , an advisor to the National Foundation for American Policy. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
Flyer in English and Spanish from the UNLV Immigration Clinic. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
State Department, June 18, 2024 " On June 18, 2024, the Biden-Harris Administration announced actions to more efficiently facilitate employment-based nonimmigrant visas for those who have graduated from college in the United States and have a job offer. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:38 am
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on June 18, 2024. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:50 am
Addressing the Court’s finding of a violation of DGCL § 251(b) when the board approved a draft version of the merger agreement in Sjunde Ap-Fonden v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
By doing so, the doctrine erroneously conflates the merits of an insurer’s confirmation objection with the threshold question under section 1109(b) of whether the insurer qualifies as a part in interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
By doing so, the doctrine erroneously conflates the merits of an insurer’s confirmation objection with the threshold question under section 1109(b) of whether the insurer qualifies as a part in interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
By doing so, the doctrine erroneously conflates the merits of an insurer’s confirmation objection with the threshold question under section 1109(b) of whether the insurer qualifies as a part in interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
The arrival of Pride Month in June is an annual reminder of the importance of workforce diversity and creating a safe place for people of all backgrounds to contribute to the success of their organizations. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
The court ordered the Defendant to either file an Amended Answer in which it would only assert those defenses for which it had a good faith basis or to otherwise file a Memorandum explaining why its Answer should be not stricken as in violation of F.R.C.P. 11(b). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:58 am
The final onus on the responding party is to show that the harm they have “suffered as a result of the moving party’s expression is sufficiently serious that the public interest in permitting the proceeding to continue outweighs the public interest in the expression” (CJA at s 137.1(4)(b); PPPA at s 4(2)(b)). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
B&R then code the transcripts and notes with a detailed rubric in search of patterns and behaviors that cut across the different regulatory programs. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
This distinction, however, is essential to understanding and upholding the proper limits of Section 13(b)(2)(B)’s requirements. [read post]
