Search for: "A CHOICE FOR WOMEN V. AGENCY FOR HEALTH" Results 181 - 200 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  This precedent includes decades-old cases, e.g., Women’s Health Network, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Changing Landscape for Marketing Health and Nutrition Benefits, Part 2 Anne V. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
This critique is offered in performative response to the context as well as to Sotomayor directly by locating these discourses within the academy and its hostility toward women of color in general, and Latinas in particular. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
A handful of determined men and women made the law a reality and have preserved it for 30 years. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
My dad was a public health economist here at Hopkins and my dad’s second wife, Mary Klarman, was an epidemiologist in the school of public health. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
In contrast, public health agencies such as the FDA and CDC cite nutritional analyses showing that the losses in nutritional content after pasteurization are negligible for the key nutrients that milk provides in the human diet. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 3:33 pm
Instead, he's on board the right wing aversion to funding any program that makes it easier for women to make choices about their reproductive lives. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
  The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
The FDA's position that applying the California proposition would conflict with its own balancing of public health objectives was critical to preemption in Dowhal:The FDA's ruling, however, reflects the concern that Proposition 65 warnings on product labels might lead pregnant women to believe that NRT products were as dangerous as smoking, or nearly so, and thus discourage the women from stopping smoking. . . . [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Programs for Children with Special Health Care Needs Child Development and Rehabilitation Center Oregon Health & Science University P.O. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 241-3464 Fax: (314) 371-0000 E-mail: mogoodwill@mo-goodwill.org Web: http://www.mersgoodwill.org Healthcare Family Voices Missouri Sarah Zerr Phone: (816) 455-2977 E-mail: shzkcmo@aol.com The state's Title V agency will soon have a Family Advisory Council, led by a parent facilitator, who provide information and support to parent groups in Missouri, and will also ensure the family perspective and input on major Title V decisions… [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Box 3724 Concord, NH 03302 Phone: (603) 229-7355 E-mail: referralsMaine@nhida.org Web: http://www.nhida.org Mental Health NAMI Maine P.O. [read post]