Search for: "A. A.C. R." Results 181 - 200 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 2:38 am by John Hochfelder
Caribbean A.C. (2d Dept. 2012), the appeals court held that the past damages award was inadequate and ordered an increase to $200,000. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 12:51 pm by Christopher Weimer (US)
The dispute arose after the Consejo Regulador del Tequila A.C., or the Tequila Regulatory Council, a non-profit entity authorized by the Mexican government to regulate and set standards for sales of tequila, sought to register TEQUILA as a certification mark with the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:26 am by gmlevine
Allan [2008] 1 A.C. 1 (H.L.) in which Lord Hoffman for the majority observed at para. 101, “I have no difficulty with the proposition that a domain name may be intangible property, like a copyright or trademark. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
Judge Jarman QC found that s.35 was ambiguous and, hence, that he was entitled to have regard to the Hansard debates that surrounded s.35 and the subsequent amendments, applying Pepper v Hart [1993] A.C. 593, HL. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Coker (relied upon by the First Department and discussed in the blog post of February, 20, 2012), and A.C. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
And here's more from A.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
Westbourne Galleries, [1973] A.C. 360 – a leading case on the principles of winding up of small companies which are in the nature of “quasi-partnerships”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Astley, [1911] A.C. 678 as follows: It is, of course, impossible to lay down in words any scale or standard by which you can measure the degree of proof which will suffice to support a particular conclusion of fact. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
Anderson, [1942] A.C. 206, arguably cast doubt on the practical significance of this common law principle. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
Bell Telephone Co. of Canada(1904), [1905] A.C. 52, [1905] 1 Olmsted 505, Régie des services publics c. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 am by emagraken
Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [1973] 2 All E.R. 943; [1974] A.C. 133 (H.L.). [5] These decisions all recognize that an antique form of action for a remedy known as an equitable bill of discovery remains known to the law and, in appropriate cases, can be the sole remedy sought in a civil action. [6] In short form, the bill of discovery would require a third party to reveal the identity of a person the plaintiff says has done them wrong. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am by emagraken
Pollack, [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L). [9] No statutory authority or case authority was provided to support the proposition that ICBC through its employees has a duty to provide a potential plaintiff with a warning that it is in their interests to obtain legal advice. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
Littlewoods Organisation Ltd [1987] A.C. 241) that in general, the law imposes no duty of care upon a party to prevent a third party from causing injury to another. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:25 am by emagraken
Essex Area Health Authority, [1988] A.C. 1074, at p. 1090, per Lord Bridge; Snell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am by Law is Cool
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728. [read post]