Search for: "A. B." Results 181 - 200 of 157,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 6:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Coalition for the American Dream, June 2024 "In response to these real threats to DACA, the Coalition for the American Dream gathered some of the country’s most respected social scientists to quantify the costs of ending DACA—including for DACA recipients, other individuals who remain eligible for the policy, their families and their communities, and for the broader U.S. economy. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:06 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Furthermore, even if the child is successful in changing to F-1 status, travelling abroad is fraught with even greater risk as a US consul can deny the F-1 visa under INA 214(b), because the visa applicant has not overcome the presumption of immigrant intent by sufficiently demonstrating that they have strong ties to their home country that will compel them to leave the United States at the end of their temporary stay. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Moreover, the complaint sufficiently alleges facts that impute liability on DOE for failing to take immediate and appropriate corrective action after being notified of LaFia's conduct (see Administrative Code § 8-107[13][b]; see Doe v Bloomberg, L.P., 36 NY3d 450, 454-455 [2021]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Moreover, the complaint sufficiently alleges facts that impute liability on DOE for failing to take immediate and appropriate corrective action after being notified of LaFia's conduct (see Administrative Code § 8-107[13][b]; see Doe v Bloomberg, L.P., 36 NY3d 450, 454-455 [2021]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Amber M. Rogers, Keenan Judge
Circuit”) partially overturned a decision issued by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) in Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Oakland, CA – A bill that would give a presumption of compensability to farmworker heat-related injury claims if the employer is found to be out of compliance with Cal/OSHA’s outdoor heat illness prevention standard would likely create more challenges than it would solve, entail significant administrative friction costs, and is unlikely to have an appreciable impact on agricultural worker safety according to a California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the complaint fails to allege fraud with any particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; see Browne v Lyft, Inc., 219 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2023]; Shah v Mitra, 171 ADed 971, 976 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
The district court relied on the provision of Section 1071(b)(2) of the Act that shields the Director of the USPTO from being named a party to an inter partes proceeding. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Following a long and somewhat sleepy existence on the margins of contractual interpretation case law, force majeure clauses (“FMCs”)  found themselves subject to a rude awakening with the global onset of COVID in 2020, and consequent interruptions to all manner of contracts relating to global supply chains, major sporting events, and many other facets of business. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Conaway & Strickler, P.C.
“As alleged, these defendants exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to develop and carry out a $100 million scheme to defraud taxpayers and provide easy access to Adderall and other stimulants for no legitimate medical purpose,” said Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:15 am by Rob Robinson
The collaborative dialogue initiated at Bürgenstock offers a framework for future negotiations, aimed at reaching a lasting, peaceful resolution. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:08 am by Mark Ashton
txtType=PDF&sessYr=2023&sessInd=0&billBody=S&billTyp=B&billNbr=0055&pn=1169 [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:40 pm by Josh Blackman
" "The final Rule also repudiated ATF's previous guidance that bump stocks did not qualify as 'machineguns' under §5845(b). [read post]