Search for: "A. C. Turner"
Results 181 - 200
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2009, 3:32 am
Kunz of Hathaway & Kunz, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming; John C. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
” Turner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 5:23 am
The federal grand jury is looking into a tax return was filed by Ronald Patrick, Ymelda Patrick’s stepson, and James D Turner and Thaddeus Smith, two trustees of Jay Patrick’s estate. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 9:54 pm
Turner, 998 F.2d 534, 536 (7th Cir.1993) (same) with United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am
Ginsburg (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of International and Comparative Trademark Law (Cambridge University Press 2020)Michal Bohaczewski, Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law, (Kluwer 2020) IPKat book review hereThe winner is: Irene Calboli and Jane C. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:57 am
Last year the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) remitted to the General Court Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P Pi-Design AG, Bodum France SAS and Bodum Logistics A/S v OHIM, Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:56 am
Appellant therefore was in legal custody when he was shown to Officers Washington and Turner, and their identifications of him were not excludable as the fruit of the warrantless and nonconsensual entry into his home, even if that intrusion was not supported by exigent circumstances. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:24 pm
Turner, 558 F.2d at 50 (holding that magistrate’s delegating task of signing warrant to subordinate did not violate Fourth Amendment, and “[a]s long as the magistrate in fact performs the substantive tasks of determining probable cause and authorizing the issuance of the warrant, the amendment is satisfied”). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:33 am
In Turner, we found valid the search of baggies found after the defendant was handcuffed and taken into the next room because of a legitimate concern for the officers’ safety: “they had already discovered a concealed weapon beneath the bedding. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:33 am
Turner, 2007 U.S. [read post]
9 May 2010, 12:17 pm
And, during confirmation hearings, a Senator asked Justice Sotomayor about precisely the question of phone and cable companies' supposed First Amendment rights to interfere with citizens' speech choices; and a judge asked the question at the FCC's recent, major argument involving Internet policy.For the answer, we can turn to one of Kagan's law review articles, which shed some light on how she thinks about these issues.In that article, she discusses two cases, Austin (later… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:02 am
c. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Then Turner arrested him.U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 10:57 am
The scheme was constructed by eccentric lawyer Eric C. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
article (see also this thread); recall that the key First Amendment arguments are in this post, which relies on the PruneYard, Turner, and Rumsfeld precedents, and in this one, which explains why Miami Herald, Hurley, and the various other "common theme" precedents don't apply. [* * *] [1.] [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:58 am
Bill Turner of Womble Carlyle recently wrote that "every day, C-level executives are required to make decisions that are even more uncertain and consequential than lawyers' fees for open-ended litigation. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:06 pm
Dew, Sam Williams, Forgeman, in Appalachians and Race 81-82 (John C. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
The author is our beloved Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which yesterday provided guidelines as to which elements can be considered in assessing the very essential nature of a trade mark and its compliance with absolute grounds (Yoshida Metal Industry Co. v Pi-Design AG and others, Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P).In 1999, the Japanese company Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
