Search for: "A. S.L. B." Results 181 - 200 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2013, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
“The charges arise from defendant's alleged illicit sexual acts with a minor girl in Cambodia, identified as S.L. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Jan von Hein
Does the term “contract for the provision of services” in Art 4(1)(b) Rome I Regulation include a building cont [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Jessica Smith
I also excluded ordinance violations that appeared to relate to the operation or parking of vehicles, which under G.S. 14-4(b) are infractions. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am by Roshonda Scipio
.] : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, Aspen PublishersFamily LawKFP100 .Z85 2011Pennsylvania divorce code annotated : with forms / Barbara B. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am by Jeff Welty
The bill proposing the amendment is S.L. 2013-300. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:33 pm by sevach
Por ilustrarlo con un ejemplo, una liquidación tributaria millonaria remitida al buzón electrónico de Pepín el carnicero ( Carnicería Pepín, S.L.) [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Mars (IP Dragon)   Colombia An illegal whisky gives you more than a dishonest hangover – seizure of counterfeit whisky bottled in bottles purchased from recycling centres (IP tango)   Europe ECJ to decide on ‘manufacturing fiction’ under Counterfeit Good Regulation (EPLAW) ECJ: ‘Fair compensation’ referral: Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (EGEDA) v Magnatrading S.L (1709 Copyright Blog) Latest news of EU patents… [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Romano Beitsma
T 471/05, point 4.1 ; T 1265/09, point 1.4 ; T 154/04, JO OEB 2008, 046, point 27).Dans le cas d'espèce, la formulation de la revendication 1 de la requête principale ne laisse planer aucun doute sur le fait que les étapes b), c) et d) du procédé revendiqué sont effectuées par le système informatique auquel il est fait référence dans la revendication. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Noting that law enforcement officers may (1) search the arrestee’s person and the area within his immediate control upon arrest and (2) may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest if (a) the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or (b) it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest, the Court determined that neither justification applied. [read post]