Search for: "ALBERT v. ALBERT" Results 181 - 200 of 1,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Ask Albert Esposito, who had his license to carry a pistol revoked after he was arrested for multiple counts of marijuana possession.In Matter of Esposito v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:48 am by Ben Vernia
On January 21, the Tax Court issued a decision in the case of Albert Campbell, who received a relator’s share of $8.75 million in 2003 for two qui tam suits against Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 5:15 am by Terry Hart
— The Authors Guild looks at last week’s Eleventh Circuit decision in Cambridge University Press v Albert, an ongoing dispute over Georgia State University’s use of copyrighted works through its digital coursepack system. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:02 am
It’s pretty easy to understand why Philadelphia Police Officer Albert Lopez failed to appear in court, four times, for the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On September 9, 2015, the California Supreme Court denied review and decertified the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s previously published opinion in Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:31 pm
The Court of Appeals reversed the circuit court and upheld LIRC's finding that Galindo's conduct amounted to misconduct under the facts and noted Galindo failed to support his argument with competent expert medical evidence.The case is Galindo v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:48 am
Brown Brothers Harriman Trust Co., N.A., as Trustee of the Benson Trust v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:33 pm
Albert Fairclough got 5,622,375 for a two-child push-chair. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
STATE Peter Albert Cantone was accused of three counts of capital sexual battery on his four-year-old daughter. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
Because the employee prevailed against the employer's breach of contract claim and the employer's breach of duty of loyalty claim was not due to a breach of the non-solicitation paragraph of the agreement, the Court affirmed the trial court's grant of attorney's fees to the employee and the denial of the same to the employer.Relying on the meaning of the term "incurred" as specified by the Dutta v. [read post]