Search for: "ALFORD v. US "
Results 181 - 200
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:53 am
Victor V. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
In Alford v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
As would be fully appropriate, the index to the cases (page v) uses the expression "passim" in lieu of giving the precise page references on which the case is cited in the 62-page brief. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Plea, Alford. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
Alford, 400 U.S. 24 (1970). [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
” IPSO Complaints A US Televangelist’s complaint that a Mirror reporter used parody quotes in an article on the Orlando shooting is upheld by IPSO on grounds of inaccuracy. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:04 am
Motors Corp., 486 N.W.2d 223, 225 (Neb. 1992) (citing Alford v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Alford v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am
Alford that courts could accept guilty pleas without admissions of guilt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:58 am
Supreme Court in Scneckloth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
One year later, defendant entered an Alford plea to four counts of felony child abuse; defendant completed his sentence in 2008. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:55 am
. [* * *] In Morrissey v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
I am sure there will come a time when we will all be very glad of having organized these matters and of your having control over the further use of your works. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm
The use of such models were also discussed this past weekend at the Runnymede Society’s (in-person) conference, where Prof. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
It may have been sexual assault, too; Raymond Clark submitted an Alford plea to that. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Claim in Brent v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1983 for failing to prevent another officer’s use of force when that force was used within a short period such that a reasonable officer in the same circumstance would not have had a realistic opportunity to intervene; (2) whether the commands “get on the ground, drop the gun” are sufficient to satisfy the warning required prior to the use of deadly force; and (3) whether a party’s self-serving testimony that contradicts his or her prior… [read post]
