Search for: "ANDERSON v. ANDERSON." Results 181 - 200 of 4,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Rick Hasen Live Blog of Oral Arguments in Trump Disqualification Case at Supreme Court (Refresh This Page Frequently for Updates)
8 Feb 2024, 6:33 am by Rick Hasen
Anderson. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
The morning read for Thursday, Feb. 8
8 Feb 2024, 6:27 am by Ellena Erskine
Anderson. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Ilya Somin] C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Ilya Somin
(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)Today, the Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
This morning I will be joining the live coverage of the Supreme Court of the arguments over the disqualification of former President Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
In Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
Term Limits v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Programming note
7 Feb 2024, 6:55 pm by Howard Bashman
Anderson, No. 23-719. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Nine: Ten Arguments that Petitioners Haven’t Raised (or that Trump Only Invoked Late in the Game)
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm by Marty Lederman
  See also Baude/Paulsen at pp. 11-16; Cawthorn v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Video: Heritage Panel on Section 3 Case
7 Feb 2024, 11:47 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
We note that in the Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Anderson as a basis for leaving the case to the political process. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Keisler and Bernstein: “Trump’s Reply Brief ‘Officer’ And ‘Office’ Arguments Miss The Mark”
6 Feb 2024, 8:52 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, delving deep into Trump’s hypertechnical lead argument: Former President Trump’s reply brief in Trump v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/