Search for: "AW v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
One of the more perplexing provisions of the draft Online Safety Bill is its multi-level definition of legal but harmful content (“lawful but awful” content, to give it its colloquial name). [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am by SHG
Yesterday, in a Supreme Court case called Brnovich v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am by Cyberleagle
One of the more perplexing provisions of the draft Online Safety Bill is its multi-level definition of legal but harmful content (lawful but awful content, to give it its colloquial name). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
With Black people holding power in the Republican Party, it is Robert who helps John land his appointment to the Supreme Court.At first, John is awed by his fellow justices, but the country is changing. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
The introduction to the Federal Court of Australia’s opinion in Universal Music Publishing v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
awful but lawful”), and illegal hate speech, or hate speech that, albeit not illegal in all jurisdictions, has the potential to impose serious social harm. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 1:24 pm by J
It’s still an awful policy, but it’s now (perhaps) slightly less odious. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Early pro-same-sex marriage decisions in state courts were, such as the Massachusetts' Supreme Judicial Court ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Referring to Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, 6 NY3d 338, the Appellate Division opined that "conflict preemption" occurs "when compliance with both federal and state law is a physical impossibility, or where the state law at issue ... stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
However, if you don’t have a preliminary idea of what the decision will look like, you can spend an awful lot of time summarizing evidence with no end purpose in mind. [read post]