Search for: "Adams v. James" Results 181 - 200 of 868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Panelists will include Foreign Policy Senior Editor James Palmer and Global Witness Policy Officer Alexandria Robins. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
Adam Williams, Director of International Policy at the UK IPO, reiterated that the UK IPO will make certain that the UK remains a world class IP environment after Brexit, no matter the manner of the adieu. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
To support application of the escape clause in this case, the Department relies heavily on the decision in Amin v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets Posted by James Andrus, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, on Monday, July 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, CalPERS, Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm by Kevin Schmidt
James Valvo (@JamesValvo) June 24, 2019 My colleague @JamesValvo and I co-authored an amicus brief for @CauseofActionDC and a coalition of transparency groups in the the FMI v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Forester, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Thursday, June 20, 2019 Tags: California, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Consumer protection, Cybersecurity, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Privacy, State law The Chilling Effect of Regulation FD: Evidence from Twitter Posted by James Naughton (Northwestern University), on Thursday, June 20, 2019 Tags: Disclosure, Information… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society blog, James Phillips explains why the pending cert petition in Kerpen v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The National Law Review, James Auslander looks at the court’s recent opinion in Sturgeon v. [read post]