Search for: "All Gibson Plaintiffs"
Results 181 - 200
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Whirlpool said that they could have all the potentially deadly machines fixed in three years. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (2004)—to hold that because “excessive” partisanship is not an idea that courts can translate into administrable doctrine, the federal judiciary should not wade into these kinds of cases at all. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In Coleman and ASL, the injury to the plaintiff came from some entity other than the plaintiff – in Coleman it was the lieutenant governor, and in ASL it was the independent commission created by the initiative. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:06 pm
While I was with Gibson Dunn and DLA Piper, I spent substantial time representing defendants in class action cases, mostly of the antitrust variety. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:06 pm
While I was with Gibson Dunn and DLA Piper, I spent substantial time representing defendants in class action cases, mostly of the antitrust variety. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:06 pm
While I was with Gibson Dunn and DLA Piper, I spent substantial time representing defendants in class action cases, mostly of the antitrust variety. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
Kennedy wisely asks why are essentially de minimis claims in front of Article III judges at all. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:35 am
But not if the Judge Gibson’s view were adopted. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
It is thus not at all uncommon for employment discrimination plaintiffs to pursue their claims under both state and federal law, or even only under state law, in order to benefit from these broader protections. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:51 am
Gibson, No. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Even if the record is not strong enough for the defendant to obtain summary judgment, the proper result is to remand the case for a trial, not to rule in favor of the plaintiff on the merits. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am
All the plaintiff must show is that had there been an appropriate warning, the plaintiff would have read it and considered it and that would have resulted in nonuse of the product. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
No one suggests that the Supreme Court has an obligation to address all such splits, even all such important splits. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
When the 2005 uniform legislation did not provide a quick fix, legislators, commentators and judges began casting about for some “usual suspects” to blame: the jury system, celebrity plaintiffs, bad pleadings, massive damages. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.Follow @prof_amar on Twitter [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The Court expressed frustration with the plaintiffs’ failure to specify exactly how these new rules violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or Constitution. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
So if the plaintiffs’ theory boils down to the notion that all unequally sized districts motivated by partisan enthusiasm are unconstitutional, then most all districts are going to be invalidated. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
(“Particularized” is a more helpful term—it essentially means an injury that is particular to the plaintiff or a limited class of people, as opposed to one shared by all persons or by all taxpayers. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
In June of 2005, Plaintiffs Cody and Hope Etherton purchased the Owens property on Kain Avenue, including all title, covenants, and rights to the use and possession of the property. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
In the settlement, Riverbed agreed to make supplemental disclosures in an SEC filing prior to the stockholder vote and pay plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees, in exchange for defendants receiving a full release from liability for all claims arising out of the merger. [read post]
