Search for: "All Plaintiffs Listed in Exhibit A of the Complaint"
Results 181 - 200
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
.' But, there are all kinds of dangers and pitfalls by allowing that theme to dominate the litigation. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:39 pm
Exhibit B to each complaint was a legally relevant listing of the Malibu Media copyrights that were allegedly infringed. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Is it an exhibition of the contrast between sophistry and faith? [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:40 am
First, the “complaint does not properly specify which photographs are at issue in the case” because although the complaint attaches an exhibit with 146 registered photographs, it further alleges that that is “not an exhaustive list of the photographs infringed by Scholastic. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
In Meese, a plaintiff who planned to exhibit three films demonstrated that the federal government’s characterization of the films as “political propaganda” would substantially harm his chances for reelection as a state senator and adversely affect his community reputation. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
The Ninth Circuit noted that there might be one remaining area where Gertz does not apply and a defamation plaintiff does not need to prove even negligence — if the plaintiff is a private figure and the speech is not on a matter of public concern. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
To some extent, this result is an artifact of the manner in which Klinger sought relief: in an exhibit to his complaint, he listed all of the story elements that he argued were on the public domain, including a number of complete characters (such as Inspector Lestrade, Mrs. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
In the complaint, the intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports listed the following counts and requests for redress: •Count I: Violation of Title 47 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:24 am
The complaint also lists a count of conversion. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:59 am
But starting sometime in 2013, Malibu's complaints started to go further: Malibu began attaching lists of "other movies not subject to plaintiff’s copyright" allegedly downloaded by the defendant. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Before digging deeper, however, it may be useful to list these 'safeguards'. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
Duffy's argument in Prenda's Motion to Remand, with Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and Exhibit C, is that Cooper and Godfread improperly removed Prenda Law's complaint to federal court because just before they did Prenda Law amended its complaint to add its new incarnation, "Alpha Law Firm," as a plaintiff, and Alpha Law Firm is a Minnesota resident, and therefore there is not "diversity" between plaintiffs and defendants. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
Duffy's argument in Prenda's Motion to Remand, with Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and Exhibit C, is that Cooper and Godfread improperly removed Prenda Law's complaint to federal court because just before they did Prenda Law amended its complaint to add its new incarnation, "Alpha Law Firm," as a plaintiff, and Alpha Law Firm is a Minnesota resident, and therefore there is not "diversity" between plaintiffs and defendants. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Complaint: The trail begins with a September 2012 federal complaint by "Ingenuity 13 LLC" against a John Doe. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
The plaintiff also exhibited symptoms of optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
Rule 7068 is not listed in that section. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Subsequently, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint in Civil Action. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
The top case in the list of cases is one I distributed to my French speaking friends, jokingly. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
The top case in the list of top cases for 2012 is one I distributed to my French speaking friends, jokingly. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:37 pm
(For example, plaintiff's exhibit 111 is referenced in the court's written statement of decision as a client list (CT 239), but on respondent's exhibit 111, included at page 11 in Appellant's Compendium of Trial Exhibits, it is shown as a 2004 spread sheet.) [read post]
