Search for: "All Unknown Parties Claiming Interests by , Through Under or Against A Named Defendant"
Results 181 - 200
of 255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 2:26 pm
A voluntary system requires both parties to think it’s in their best interest to participate and that may not be the case with many defendants. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
/Iranian double agent named David Lovejoy. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:59 am
(If operating under one trade name the rule will still be that Visa and MasterCard must be accepted at all locations or none.) [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:59 am
(If operating under one trade name the rule will still be that Visa and MasterCard must be accepted at all locations or none.) [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:18 pm
As I wrote in 2005, closely tracking the actual FCA language: - The plaintiff must show that it has “a bona fideclaim” against the proposed defendant, “...i.e. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
Legal name, for these purposes, means the name under which a person or entity is registered in the state. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:13 am
Pursuant to that right, Chloro CI had approached the Bombay High Court and there is no bar under any statute which prevents it from doing so.2) The Appellant, who has the real interest in the case, had included R3 and R4 not merely to overcome the arbitration clause but because R3 and R4 are necessary parties, against whom substantive relief has been claimed.3) Under Section 45 of the 1996 Act, the request to refer the dispute to arbitration must… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
However, it has so far refrained from doing so because several parties have expressed interest in the data. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
Apart from the ISPs mentioned, it specifies five other parties all denoted by the fictitious name "Ashok Kumar", and then also "other unknown persons", against whom the injunction applies. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Even if it has such standing, the copyright owner must normally be made a party. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Defendant’s name also continued to appear in the press. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Though they argued that Schütz abandoned the mark by failing to act against other alleged infringers, there was no proof of actual abandonment, nor did they show that the mark had become generic through use by at least six other entities for cross-bottling. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
Appeals -- Non-final orders -- Order declaring that certain provisions of a settlement agreement are binding and enforceable, and directing parties to reconvene settlement negotiations, is a non-appealable, non-final order -- Argument that court has jurisdiction under rule which provides for the appeal of non-final orders concerning injunctions is rejected -- Order is not designed to protect property or other rights from injury by prohibiting or commanding certain acts, and is more… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
For example, the majority of individuals will satisfy the section 5000A requirement through their employer-sponsored insurance plans that Congress has extensively regulated, or through Medicaid or Medicare. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- No abuse of discretion in ordering sequestration of rents -- Lack of standing is affirmative defense to foreclosure, and trial court should refrain from conclusively ruling on affirmative defenses in ruling on motion to sequester rentsTIDEWATER ESTATES CO-OP, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, and all other unknown parties including claimants, persons or parties, natural or corporate,… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:14 pm
Colonial filed a Lanham Act/defamation complaint against unknown Doe defendants. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
What I found really interesting about the case is that for the first time a court is asked to serve an injunction against the publication of a specific torrent file. [read post]
