Search for: "Amen v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2013, 9:12 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
The DNT mechanism must be (i) universal, (ii) easy to find and use, (iii) persistent, (iv) effective and enforceable, and (v) apply to more than just advertisements (FTC, p. 21). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
They think it's unconstitutional for a state to recognize that juvenile offenders have undeveloped brains and hence can potentially change and be amenable to rehabilitation and yet categorically exclude certain youthful offenders (e.g., LWOP offenders) from possible parole. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by Allan Erbsen
An interesting aspect of the Court's recent decision in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:29 am
Most states classify trade secrets and customer contacts as protectable interests, and Missouri is no exception.The recent Missouri appellate decision Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
”Further, in EEOC v Wyoming, the Supreme Court held that the Commerce Clause provided Congress with the constitutional authority to make the ADEA’s substantive provisions applicable to the states. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Qualifications for employment in the public service mandated by statute may not be waivedMartin, as Administratrix of The Estate of Christos Lekkas v State of New York et al., 82 AD2d 712Christos Lekkas, a permanent Assistant Clinical Physician in the then Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,* [OMRDD] was never licensed to practice medicine in New York or in any State of the United States or in the Dominion of Canada. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Qualifications for employment in the public service mandated by statute may not be waivedMartin, as Administratrix of The Estate of Christos Lekkas v State of New York et al., 82 AD2d 712Christos Lekkas, a permanent Assistant Clinical Physician in the then Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,* [OMRDD] was never licensed to practice medicine in New York or in any State of the United States or in the Dominion of Canada. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Preliminary issue: Jurisdiction The preliminary issue was heard by the Divisional Court (Sir Brian Leveson PQBD and Leggatt J) on the 2 November 2016, and by Order of that Court, the IPT was not amenable to judicial review. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
Likewise, the right of parents to control the education and upbringing of their children is fundamental under Pierce v Society of Sisters and Meyer v Nebraska, yet states have enormous latitude in requiring parents to send their kids to school, vaccinate their kids, and so forth. [read post]