Search for: "American Can Co. v. Davis" Results 181 - 200 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Some analysts have argued that partisan considerations, more than other factors, have driven earlier episodes in American history in which new states have been added. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  The American Law Institute’s unfortunate adoption of “strict liability” (sufficiently unfortunate, the ALI has done away with it except for manufacturing defect) missed a lot of product liability issues – the learned intermediary rule for one – that have become extremely widespread and important in product liability over the last 45 years. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This same lesson can be illustrated by the other significant districting case decided a few weeks before Harris, Evanwel v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Davis (26 U.S. 229, 1976), however, the Court ruled against the African-American plaintiffs rejected for positions in the D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Such litigation in the dark is generally not allowed in the American court system, especially as to such central matters in a case. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
China ought to have known were pirated: (IAM),IFPI v Yahoo judgment - Uncertainty is bad for business: (Experience Not Logic),Court grants ‘well-known' status to B&Q's Chinese trade mark: (Rouse & Co. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:22 pm
As a lawyer, Marshall, of course, is best known for defeating John Davis, the lawyer who represented the Topeka school board in the 1954 desegregation case of Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013 (10th Cir. 2001) (already one of our favorite warning causation cases), the defendant won summary judgment despite both "I would have monitored more closely" and a heeding presumption because defense counsel didn't give up. [read post]