Search for: "Amp Inc. v. U. S" Results 181 - 200 of 1,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On the merger front, for example, the DOJ has challenged Penguin Random House’s proposed acquisition of Simon & Schuster on the ground that the deal would supposedly reduce competition for publishing rights and suppress compensation paid to authors.17  The FTC has also had several recent high profile investigations and settlements of labor organizations, including the Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama and the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm by Kalvis Golde
The court found that the company’s executives knew they were reporting higher U&C prices. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kaufman v Boies Schiller Flexner LLP2022 NY Slip Op 32743(U)  August 15, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 154149/2018  Judge: James d’Auguste is the very fraught story of a massively fought matrimonial action. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:27 am by Eric Goldman
Target Class Certified The post A Court Calls Out Congress & the DOJ for Not Clarifying the ADA’s Application to Online Retailers–Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“For the continuous representation doctrine to apply, ‘there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependant relationship between the client and the attorney’ ” (Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789, quoting Luk Lamellen U. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Marcum LLP v L’abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP   2022 NY Slip Op 31913(U)  June 17, 2022  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151586/2021  Judge: Joel M. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
See Dobbs, 597 U.S., at ___ (BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., dissenting) (slip op., at 16) (explaining that the Framers “defined rights in general terms to permit future evolution in their scope and meaning”); New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]