Search for: "Andrew v. Kennedy"
Results 181 - 200
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
It took only a few minutes into the argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:25 am
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Obergfell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
As Justice Kennedy correctly noted in Comstock, it comes not from the New Deal Court, but from the 1955 Warren Court case of Williamson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
In Husted v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
On 6 December 2018 Nicklin J heard applications in the case of Morgan v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
Justice Souter also engaged in some fairly rigorous questioning of Massey's lawyer, Andrew Frey. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
On the contrary, Kennedy authored many decisions that enhanced the power of businesses, including the court’s decision giving corporations First Amendment free speech protection in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
Powell, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbus, for Appellant Matthew Aalim Andrew T. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
A. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Graham v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am
In Cullen v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
Kennedy. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
The rational basis test used by Judge Walker is in line with the standard used by Justice Kennedy in cases like Lawrence v. [read post]
