Search for: "Application of Mueller"
Results 181 - 200
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
This application was refused by HHJ Hacon at first instance judgment ([2019] EWHC 3377 (Pat)). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Unfortunately, only a handful of states have offered official positions on the application of the nonintervention rule in the cyber context. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:19 am
The District Court dismissed the PI applications (see the report on this blog). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
These measures have been supplemented by those established in Royal Decree-Law 8/2020, of 17 March, as regards other time limits applicable to the legal regime governing legal entities. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:32 pm
It’s useful for both, but Nick thinks the second application may not really be ready for a year – too late for this outbreak. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:01 pm
It's useful for both, but Nick thinks the second application may not really be ready for a year – too late for this outbreak. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:42 pm
As with the emergency purposes exception, there is a lack of guidance on application of this exception. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
The Judiciary Committee also filed an application asking for release of three categories of redacted materials: “(1) all portions of the Mueller Report that were redacted pursuant to Rule 6(e); (2) any portions of grand jury transcripts or exhibits referenced in those redactions; and (3) any underlying grand jury testimony and exhibits that relate directly to certain individuals and events described in the Mueller Report. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:02 am
These communications have been sent out over the last three years but the EPO admits that few applicants have been prompted to withdraw their applications to receive a full exam fee refund. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:34 pm
Once Germany will be in a position to ratify the UPC Agreement and the Protocol on the Provisional Application, arrangements will be made to deal with the practical implications of the UK‘s departure. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:52 am
The House Judiciary Committee had filed an application on July 26, 2019, for an order authorizing the release of certain grand jury materials that were redacted in the version of the Mueller report presented to members of Congress and the public. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:47 am
It’s in this context that Walton’s opinion should be understood: as a vote of no confidence in the presumption’s applicability to the Trump administration. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Circuit ordering a review of Attorney General William Barr’s redaction of the Mueller report. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:16 am
Elliot Setzer shared an opinion from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court regarding reforms to the FISA application process. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
During the investigation, Special Counsel Robert Mueller interviewed Don McGahn (who was, at the time, White House counsel) on several separate occasions. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:13 pm
Was the Government aware of the accusations published in the press of a loss of quality in the examination of patent applications and the granting of patents vis-à-vis the EPO under its previous management, and what is its view thereon? [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 11:35 pm
The other possibility is – and I’d like to see that even without the UK’s presence, because Europe has needed a new patent system for 50 years – that it will proceed with ratification of, first, the Protocol for Provisional Application and then the UPCA itself. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
In his recent rash of 11 pardons and commutations, Trump dispensed with the Department of Justice process for vetting pardon applications and relied instead on the advice of friends and allies, and on his own judgments about redressing “unfairness. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
A recent opinion piece in the National Post by Leonid Sarota and Asher Honickman explained how the rule of law functions: it constrains government and when people perceive it to overstep, they can challenge it; but it also requires individuals to restrain their actions and use the legal sysem and when they are unsuccessful, they must accept it. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:36 am
With reference to G 1/93, the Board first clarifies that the idea underlying Article 123(2) EPC is that the applicant or patent proprietor should not be allowed to improve their position by adding subject-matter not disclosed in the application as filed, as this would give rise to an unwarranted advantage and could be damaging to the legal security of third parties relying on the content of the original application. [read post]
