Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 181 - 200
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 2:58 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
In Apprendi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
New Jersey in 2000 SCOTUS issued a string of decisions saying, in essence, that judges can't make factual findings that increase sentences; only juries can do that. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:58 pm
In particular, Ball's take on the Supreme Court's work in Apprendi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
New Jersey, Blakely v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
New Jersey, any fact that increases an offender's maximum punishment must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:32 am
Fairley, which also features language addressing Apprendi v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:42 pm
New Jersey... [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:50 am
New Jersey-a landmark decision that celebrates its tenth anniversary this year. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
New Jersey -- a landmark decision that celebrates its tenth anniversary this year. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:23 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Crawford v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
New Jersey and sequels apply when a jury is asked to impose death, rather than life, as a sentence. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
New Jersey, et al. (08-352). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Thompson's best but unsuccessful shot on appeal was to argue that under Apprendi v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:18 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:11 am
New Jersey in 2000 is limited to sentencing for single crimes, not to the arrangement for punishing multiple offenses. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000): "'[T]he indictment must allege whatever is in law essential to the punishment sought to be inflicted.' (quoting 1 J. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 8:07 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).Read the opinion here. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 12:42 am
But, whatever the cause, it is a great day for military justice that Apprendi v. [read post]
