Search for: "Ashby Jones"
Results 181 - 200
of 549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Depending on the outcome of the case, Ashby Jones of the WSJ Law Blog wonders if “class-action lawsuits [are] going the way of the Dodo. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:29 pm
Ashby Jones: Are class-action lawsuits going the way of the Dodo? [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm
For additional thoughts on what might be fueling all the recent law firm mergers, see Ashby Jones’s post on the WSJ Law Blog.Good luck to Squire Sanders (or Squire Sanders Hammonds, in selected jurisdictions). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am
Ashby Jones also has a post on Wialliamson at the Law Blog in which he observes that the Court’s 2000 decision in Geier v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
No time to post something original today, but wanted to link to some other stuff you might not have seen yet: First, there was an article in this morning’s WSJ by Law Blog author Ashby Jones, with Joann Lublin, called “Critics Blow Whistle on Law. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:14 am
Back at the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones also takes up the issue of the Court’s “Strange Recusal Process,” agreeing that “Lubet’s argument makes some sense: the current rule seems completely ineffectual. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:57 am
Ashby Jones of WSJ Law Blog characterizes efforts by Congressman Peter DeFazio (discussed in James’s round-up yesterday), to investigate the prospect of impeaching Chief Justice Roberts as “startling,” while Damon Root of Reason also expresses doubts about DeFazio’s efforts. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:13 pm
Blount with the blog faculty The Wall Street Journal has published to articles online that discuss the space law regime as it applies to the Moon: Ashby Jones, On the Moon, Water, Water Everywhere, But Not a Drop to Own, Wall Street Journal and Ashby Jones, Lunar Rush Far, Far Away as Earthlings Struggle With Laws in Space, Wall Street Journal [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
In the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones predicts an outcome favorable for Ashcroft. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:41 pm
Ashby Jones: An interesting array of prominent law professors from across the political spectrum have decided to support California’s Proposition 19, which proposes to legalize the recreational use of marijuana. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:38 pm
Ashby Jones: According to a Reuters report, a federal judge in Pensacola, Fla., has ruled that 20 U.S. states can proceed with their lawsuit seeking to overturn President Barack Obama’s landmark healthcare reform law. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:59 pm
From Ashby Jones’ post on the Law Blog, links to the Judge’s Order today and 84-page findings of fact and conclusions of law. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
[Currents / New Yorker]* Ashby Jones interviews Monet Pincus, the South Carolina family law practitioner behind the “we don’t work weekends” website. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:23 am
With approximately forty percent of the Court’s docket so far made up of business-related cases, Ashby Jones of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog offers“Your Early Guide to the Big Business Cases of the High Court Term. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am
The BLT’s Marcia Coyle, the WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones, and RTT News have coverage. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
Ashby Jones: In its Citizens United opinion from last year, the Supreme Court shot down certain campaign-finance limits. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
At the WSJ Law Blog, Nathan Koppel and Ashby Jones examine the effect of the Court’s decision last June in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:40 am
"Securities Ruling Limits Claims of Fraud": In today's edition of The Wall Street Journal, Nathan Koppel and Ashby Jones have an article that begins, "The U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:59 am
” In response, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog’s Ashby Jones wonders whether that statistic also indicates that “nearly one out of three Americans think the country would be okay without the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
At the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones discusses Tuesday’s New York Times editorial on political Supreme Court clerk hiring (which Adam covered in yesterday’s round-up) and considers whether “taking the sole authority of clerk-hiring away from the justices” might be “a larger correction than needed. [read post]
