Search for: "Austin v. Succession of Austin" Results 181 - 200 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 7:01 am by Inga Kristina Trauthig
Inga Kristina Trauthig of the University of Texas at Austin shows how both sides are using chat and encrypted messaging apps as part of the propaganda struggle and explains why this may be the new normal for future conflicts. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
University of Texas at Austin with Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, two cases involving different aspects of race-based affirmative action. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:25 pm
Other coverage: Austin Business Journal Baylor Law lauds its Texas Supreme Court clerks The press release “High bar passage caps week of success for Baylor Law” includes a mention of the four Baylor students who will be clerking for the Court this next term. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am by JB
  The idea of “equal sovereignty” was offered as dicta in Northwest Austin, joined by eight Justices. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am by Garrett Hinck
And Ben Buchanan shared his essay analyzing the successes and failures of the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:23 am by SHG
The trick here is to reframe the question from accused v. accuser to weak woman v. powerful man. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm by Chris Castle
  A successful impossibility defense may be thought of as an exoneration of the breach, so excuses nonperformance before the breach actually arises. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
April 20, 2012)(Opinion by Lehrmann) (on petition for review from the Austin Court of Appeals) LEGAL TERMS AND LINKS: Sabine Pilot Exception to Employment at Will Doctrine  Employment at Will [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Update: It is interesting to contrast the Court’s willingness to give Congress more time to reconsider the Voting Rights Act in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
If you're the sort of person who reads transcripts of Supreme Court oral arguments, and if you have even a passing interest in civil rights law, then you probably figured that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was history.The case was Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]