Search for: "B. Sullivan" Results 181 - 200 of 1,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 11:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That motion failed in the district court, and the Court of Appeals (Chin, Menashi and Sullivan) affirms. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
Sullivan, J., would deny transfer, believing the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case to be correct. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:51 am by Kara OBrien
The following memo, Proposed Rules Under the Investment Advisers Act, was sent in by our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Sullivan, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the use of statistical sampling and extrapolation by Medicare contractors, currently known as MACs or ZPICs, in conducting post payment reviews. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 200904 (Sept. 2020).Paul B. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Bryen    Means and End(ing)s: Nomos Versus Narrative in Early Rabbinic ExegesisNatalie B. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Howard Friedman
  Judge Hoff, writing for herself and Judge Sullivan, said in part:[B]ecause Appellant’s negligent supervision and negligent failure to supervise children claims would require interpretation of religion doctrine, policy, and administration amounting to an excessive entanglement between church and state, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents....... [read post]