Search for: "B. v. S." Results 181 - 200 of 57,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2024, 11:28 am by Kenan Farrell
Angie’s Lists, Inc. d/b/a Angi (SD 7/18/2024) – The defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint has been extended to October 14, 2024. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:56 am by Dimo Michailov
Example:  Institute A is a 501(c)(3) organization which enters into a Cooperative Agreement with University B pursuant to which Institute A and University B create a joint program allowing University B students to obtain certain training and mentoring programs that are provided by Institute A. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 2:00 am by Adeline Chong
Zhou v Jing [2023] NSWSC 214 (Australia),[21] Yin v Wu [2023] VSCA 130 (Australia)[22]). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:39 am by Alessandro Cerri
Infringement under section 10(2) TMA 1994Having found that most salient parts of Easylife Stylised Mark's registration would not be revoked, the Court moved on to the allegations of infringement, focusing on the assessment of: (a) similarity; and (b) likelihood of confusion. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
Jillians v Red Kite Community Housing. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 3:54 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
On 29 June 2020, Ghibli S.R.L. filed an opposition to this registration on the basis of its earlier EU figurative mark 17 931 716 designating classes 18 and 25, based on Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR.AnalysisRelying explicitly on Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR, the Opposition Division divided its analysis into several steps. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's decision by Judge David Herrera Urias in Leadership Institute v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 1:20 pm by admin
If A causes B, then if in the same world, ceteris paribus, we do not have A, then we don’t have B. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Prospect responded that it should not be made to produce the mediation statement because (a) doing so would violate Magistrate Judge Wang’s individual rules regarding confidentiality of communications during settlement, and (b) the court should adopt a “mediation privilege” that no court in New York has yet to accept (see NYSCEF # 114, Prospect R 14 Ltr). [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 2:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In reviewing the “prong one” claims as to discriminatory lending, the court first found, with clear reference to the Delaware courts’ decision in the Marchand v. [read post]